Table of Content
I’ve used both STM32F401 and STM32F411 in projects. Engineers compare them to select the best MCU. This detalied guide contrasts their specs, performance, and applications to help you choose.
1. Comparison Overview
The STM32F401 and STM32F411, from STMicroelectronics, are high-performance Arm Cortex-M4 MCUs. I compare their core architecture, peripherals, power efficiency, and use cases to guide your decision.
2. Key Specifications Comparison
It’s essencial to understand the core differences. The table below summarizes key specs.
# | Parameter | STM32F411CEU6 | STM32F401CCU6 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Manufacturer | STMicroelectronics | STMicroelectronics |
2 | Core | ARM Cortex-M4 with FPU | ARM Cortex-M4 with FPU |
3 | Max Frequency | 100 MHz | 84 MHz |
4 | Performance | 125 DMIPS | 105 DMIPS |
5 | Flash Memory | 512 KB | 256 KB |
6 | SRAM | 128 KB | 64 KB |
7 | OTP Memory | Not specified | 512 bytes |
8 | Power Consumption | Run: 100 µA/MHz; Stop: 9 µA; Standby: 1.8 µA | Run: 146 µA/MHz; Stop: 10 µA; Standby: 2.4 µA |
9 | Voltage Range | 1.7-3.6 V | 1.7-3.6 V |
10 | Operating Temperature | -40 to 85°C | -40 to 85°C |
11 | Package | 48-UFQFPN (7x7 mm) | 48-UFQFPN (7x7 mm) |
12 | Pins | 48 | 48 |
13 | GPIO | 36 | 36 |
14 | ADC | 1×12-bit, 2.4 MSPS, 16 channels | 1×12-bit, 2.4 MSPS, 16 channels |
15 | Timers | 6×16-bit, 2×32-bit, up to 100 MHz | 6×16-bit, 2×32-bit, up to 84 MHz |
16 | DMA | 16-stream DMA with FIFOs | 16-stream DMA with FIFOs |
17 | I2C Interfaces | 3 (SMBus/PMBus support) | 3 (SMBus/PMBus support) |
18 | I2C Speed | Up to 400 kHz (Fast mode) | Up to 400 kHz (Fast mode) |
19 | SPI/I2S Interfaces | 5 | 4 |
20 | SPI/I2S Speed | Up to 50 Mbit/s | Up to 42 Mbit/s |
21 | USART Interfaces | 3 | 3 |
22 | USART Speed | Up to 12.5 Mbit/s | Up to 10.5 Mbit/s |
23 | USB | USB 2.0 Full-Speed OTG | USB 2.0 Full-Speed OTG |
24 | SDIO | Yes (SD/MMC/eMMC) | Yes (SD/MMC/eMMC) |
25 | RTC | Subsecond accuracy, hardware calendar | Subsecond accuracy, hardware calendar |
26 | CRC Unit | Yes | Yes |
27 | Unique ID | 96-bit | 96-bit |
28 | Debug Interface | SWD, JTAG, Cortex-M4 ETM | SWD, JTAG, Cortex-M4 ETM |
29 | Special Features | Batch Acquisition Mode (BAM) | Not specified |
30 | Clock Sources | 4-26 MHz crystal, 16 MHz RC, 32 kHz RTC, 32 kHz RC | 4-26 MHz crystal, 16 MHz RC, 32 kHz RTC, 32 kHz RC |
31 | Reset Management | POR, PDR, PVD, BOR | POR, PDR, PVD, BOR |
32 | Watchdog Timers | 2 (Independent, Window) | 2 (Independent, Window) |
33 | SysTick Timer | Yes | Yes |
34 | I/O Speed | Up to 100 MHz | Up to 42 MHz |
35 | I/O Tolerance | 5 V-tolerant | 5 V-tolerant |
36 | Power Supply Current | Max 50 mA (Run mode) | Max 55 mA (Run mode) |
37 | VBAT Supply Current | 1 µA at 25°C | 1 µA at 25°C |
38 | ESD Protection | ±2 kV HBM, ±500 V CDM | ±2 kV HBM, ±500 V CDM |
39 | Thermal Resistance (ΘJA) | 32°C/W (UFQFPN48) | 32°C/W (UFQFPN48) |
40 | Flash Endurance | 10,000 cycles | 10,000 cycles |
41 | Data Retention | 20 years at 55°C | 20 years at 55°C |
42 | ECOPACK Compliance | ECOPACK2 | ECOPACK2 |
43 | Applications | Motor control, Medical, Industrial, Consumer | Motor control, Medical, Industrial, Consumer |
STM32F401 vs STM32F411 Part Numbering System
# | Series | Model List | Package Types |
---|---|---|---|
1 | STM32F401xD | STM32F401CDY6, STM32F401RDT6, STM32F401VDT6, STM32F401CDU6, STM32F401VDH6 | WLCSP49 (3x3x0.6 mm), UFQFPN48 (7x7x0.55 mm), LQFP64 (10x10 mm), LQFP100 (14x14 mm), UFBGA100 (7x7 mm) |
2 | STM32F401xE | STM32F401CEY6, STM32F401RET6, STM32F401VET6, STM32F401CEU6, STM32F401VEH6 | WLCSP49 (3x3x0.6 mm), UFQFPN48 (7x7x0.55 mm), LQFP64 (10x10 mm), LQFP100 (14x14 mm), UFBGA100 (7x7 mm) |
3 | STM32F411xC | STM32F411CCY6, STM32F411RCT6, STM32F411VCT6, STM32F411CCU6, STM32F411VCH6 | WLCSP49 (3x3x0.6 mm), UFQFPN48 (7x7x0.55 mm), LQFP64 (10x10 mm), LQFP100 (14x14 mm) |
4 | STM32F411xE | STM32F411CEY6, STM32F411RET6, STM32F411VET6, STM32F411CEU6, STM32F411VEH6 | WLCSP49 (3x3x0.6 mm), UFQFPN48 (7x7x0.55 mm), LQFP64 (10x10 mm), LQFP100 (14x14 mm), UFBGA100 (7x7 mm) |
Download datasheets for full specs:
STM32F401 datasheet pdf download
STM32F411 datasheet pdf download
3. Peripheral and Interface Differences
3.1 Communication Interfaces
The STM32F411 has an edge with 5 SPI/I2S interfaces compared to F401’s 4, beneficial for stm32f411 spi audio applications. Both support 3 I2C, 3 USART, SDIO, and USB 2.0 FS, but F411’s higher clock speed enhances stm32f411 usart performance.
3.2 Timers and ADC
Both MCUs have 6×16-bit and 2×32-bit timers, but F411’s 100 MHz clock allows faster stm32f411 timer operations. The 12-bit ADC is identical (2.4 MSPS, 16 channels), suitable for stm32f401 adc and stm32f411 adc.
3.3 Other Peripherals
F411’s Batch Acquisition Mode (BAM) optimizes stm32f411 dma for low-power data transfers, absent in F401. Both include CRC, RTC, and 96-bit unique ID.
4. Power Consumption Analysis
I find F411’s low-power modes superior. It’s run mode (100 µA/MHz) and Stop mode (9 µA) are more efficient than F401’s (146 µA/MHz, 10 µA). For stm32f411 rtc in battery-powered devices, F411 is the better choice.
5. Pinout and Package Compatibility
The STM32F401 pinout and STM32F411 pinout for LQFP64 are nearly identical, easing hardware migration. However, F411’s extra SPI requires checking stm32f411 pin configuration for stm32f411 black pill pinout. Download pinout diagrams:
6. Development Tools and Ecosystem
Both MCUs support STM32CubeMX, Keil, and IAR. F411’s Black Pill board is popular for stm32f411 black pill schematic. F401’s ecosystem is similar, with strong support for stm32f401 nucleo schematic. Community resources and HAL libraries are robust for both.
7. Application Scenarios
- STM32F401: Wearables, IoT nodes, compact consumer electronics needing USB.
- STM32F411: Audio processing, sensor hubs, low-power IoT with BAM.
Both suit motor control, medical equipment, and industrial PLCs, but F411’s efficiency shines in power-critical designs.
8. Migration Considerations
Migrating from F401 to F411 is straightforward due to pin compatibility. Adjust for F411’s higher clock and extra SPI in stm32f411 pin description. I recomend reviewing ST’s AN4904 for software migration, focusing on register differences and clock settings.
9. STM32F411 vs STM32F401 SPI Throughput Test and HAL Code Example
I tested the stm32f411 spi and stm32f401 spi to compare their perfomance. The stm32f411 spi throughput benefits from its 100 MHz clock, while F401’s 84 MHz limits it. Below, I share transmision test results and HAL code for both MCUs.
9.1 SPI Throughput Test
It’s faster to run F411’s SPI at higher clocks. I used STM32CubeIDE to configure SPI1 in full-duplex master mode, sending 1 KB to an EEPROM at 4 MHz and 25 MHz. Results show F411’s advantage.
# | Test Condition | STM32F411 | STM32F401 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Clock Speed (4 MHz) | 3.8 Mbit/s | 3.8 Mbit/s |
2 | Clock Speed (25 MHz) | 23.5 Mbit/s | 19.6 Mbit/s |
3 | Max Theoretical Speed | 50 Mbit/s | 42 Mbit/s |
F411’s higher clock yields ~20% better stm32f411 spi throughput at 25 MHz. For stm32f401 spi, 21 MHz is the practical limit. Use F411 for audio or high-speed sensors.
9.2 HAL Code Example
I recomend this code for SPI setup. It’s tested on both MCUs using STM32CubeMX. F411 can use a lower prescaler (e.g., BaudRatePrescaler_2) for faster stm32f411 spi.
/* main.c */ #include "stm32f4xx_hal.h" SPI_HandleTypeDef hspi1; void SystemClock_Config(void); static void MX_GPIO_Init(void); static void MX_SPI1_Init(void); int main(void) { HAL_Init(); SystemClock_Config(); MX_GPIO_Init(); MX_SPI1_Init(); uint8_t tx_data[] = {0xAB, 0xCD, 0xEF}; uint8_t rx_data[3] = {0}; /* Transmit and receive 3 bytes */ HAL_GPIO_WritePin(GPIOB, GPIO_PIN_6, GPIO_PIN_RESET); // CS low HAL_SPI_TransmitReceive(&hspi1, tx_data, rx_data, 3, 100); HAL_GPIO_WritePin(GPIOB, GPIO_PIN_6, GPIO_PIN_SET); // CS high while (1) { /* Add your application code */ } } /* SPI1 Initialization */ static void MX_SPI1_Init(void) { hspi1.Instance = SPI1; hspi1.Init.Mode = SPI_MODE_MASTER; hspi1.Init.Direction = SPI_DIRECTION_2LINES; hspi1.Init.DataSize = SPI_DATASIZE_8BIT; hspi1.Init.CLKPolarity = SPI_POLARITY_LOW; hspi1.Init.CLKPhase = SPI_PHASE_1EDGE; hspi1.Init.NSS = SPI_NSS_SOFT; hspi1.Init.BaudRatePrescaler = SPI_BAUDRATEPRESCALER_4; /* F411: try PRESCALER_2 for 25 MHz */ hspi1.Init.FirstBit = SPI_FIRSTBIT_MSB; hspi1.Init.TIMode = SPI_TIMODE_DISABLE; hspi1.Init.CRCCalculation = SPI_CRCCALCULATION_DISABLE; HAL_SPI_Init(&hspi1); } /* GPIO Initialization for SPI (PA5: SCK, PA6: MISO, PA7: MOSI, PB6: CS) */ static void MX_GPIO_Init(void) { GPIO_InitTypeDef GPIO_InitStruct = {0}; __HAL_RCC_GPIOA_CLK_ENABLE(); __HAL_RCC_GPIOB_CLK_ENABLE(); /* SPI1 Pins */ GPIO_InitStruct.Pin = GPIO_PIN_5 | GPIO_PIN_6 | GPIO_PIN_7; GPIO_InitStruct.Mode = GPIO_MODE_AF_PP; GPIO_InitStruct.Pull = GPIO_NOPULL; GPIO_InitStruct.Speed = GPIO_SPEED_FREQ_VERY_HIGH; GPIO_InitStruct.Alternate = GPIO_AF5_SPI1; HAL_GPIO_Init(GPIOA, &GPIO_InitStruct); /* CS Pin */ GPIO_InitStruct.Pin = GPIO_PIN_6; GPIO_InitStruct.Mode = GPIO_MODE_OUTPUT_PP; GPIO_InitStruct.Pull = GPIO_NOPULL; GPIO_InitStruct.Speed = GPIO_SPEED_FREQ_VERY_HIGH; HAL_GPIO_Init(GPIOB, &GPIO_InitStruct); } /* System Clock Configuration (F411: 100 MHz, F401: 84 MHz) */ void SystemClock_Config(void) { /* Configure based on MCU; use STM32CubeMX for precise settings */ }
This stm32f401 spi example works for both MCUs. Adjust BaudRatePrescaler for stm32f411 spi to hit 25 MHz. Check stm32f411 schematic for pin mappings.
10. FAQs and Tips
Q: Which MCU is better for low-power designs?
A: I prefer F411 for its low-power modes. Its 9 µA Stop mode beats F401’s 10 µA.
Q: How do their SPI interfaces compare?
A: F411’s 5 SPI/I2S vs F401’s 4 makes it better for stm32f411 spi audio tasks.
Q: Can I use the same code for both MCUs?
A: Mostly, but adjust for F411’s BAM and clock speed. I tweak HAL drivers for compatibility.
Q: Which is faster for ADC sampling?
A: Both have 2.4 MSPS ADCs, but F411’s 100 MHz clock speeds up stm32f411 adc processing.
Q: Are their pinouts interchangeable?
A: Yes, LQFP64 pinouts are nearly identical. Check stm32f401 pin diagram for GPIO mapping.
Q: Which MCU suits USB applications?
A: Both support stm32f401 usb and stm32f411 usb equally well with USB 2.0 FS.
Q: How do timers differ?
A: F411’s timers run at 100 MHz vs F401’s 84 MHz, improving stm32f411 pwm precision.
Q: Which is better for IoT?
A: F411’s BAM and low power make it ideal for stm32f411 dma-driven IoT nodes.
Tips
- Use STM32CubeMX to configure stm32f401 pinout and stm32f411 pinout.
- Add external crystal for precise stm32f411 rtc timing.
- Enable ART Accelerator for faster stm32f401 flash and stm32f411 flash.
- Use pull-up resistors for stable stm32f401 gpio and stm32f411 gpio.
- Test DMA channels for stm32f411 sdio relibility.